Sunday, April 11, 2021

Both Trump and Clinton Twitter Accounts have 40% Bots as Followers

Must read

Supreme Court TCPA ATDS Ruling a Big Win for Telemarketers

On April 1, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in the matter of Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid that is...

Is John Monarch Behind a $100 Million Bank Scam?

John Monarch was promoted Heavily by Affiliate Summit Founder Missy Ward, raising lots of questions. The Securities and Exchange commission delivered an early...

FTC Releases 2020 Annual Highlights

On March 25, 2021, the Federal Trade Commission released its 2020 Annual Highlights, emphasizing the agency’s ongoing efforts to protect consumers. “Despite the challenges...

Marketing Fraud Continues to Grow in 2021, and Ad Companies Are Clueless

A new report from White Ops demonstrates that marketing fraud is growing, but that many in the online advertising space may not...
Pesach Lattin
Pesach Lattinhttp://pacevegas.com
Pesach "Pace" Lattin is one of the top experts in interactive advertising, affiliate marketing. Pace Lattin is known for his dedication to ethics in marketing, and focus on compliance and fraud in the industry, and has written numerous articles for publications from MediaPost, ClickZ, ADOTAS and his own blogs.

Anyone with a lot of Twitter followers knows that at least some of them aren’t really humans.  Bots have long been a problem on Twitter, and that isn’t ever likely to change.  According to a new study by eZanga, however, it seems that the presidential candidate’s Twitter accounts are especially susceptible to being followed by bot accounts.

Donald Trump, who regularly talks about the fact that he has about 12 million followers on Twitter, actually has something much closer to 7 or 8 million.  The report indicated that 39% of his followers (translating to about 4.3 million accounts) are actually fake bots.

Hillary Clinton isn’t too much better in this area.  She has about 37% bot traffic, accounting for 3.1 million accounts.

Both candidates are spending millions on digital ads, including on ads targeting their Twitter followers.  This means that they are wasting a huge amount of money marketing to an audience that really isn’t there.

As far as anyone can tell so far, neither party or candidate is putting any real effort into minimizing the amount of ad fraud that they fall victim to.  Instead, they seem to be more interested in just pushing out as many ads as they possibly can, and hoping that at least some of them are seen by real people and may be effective.

- Advertisement -

More articles

2 Comments

What's your opinion?

- Advertisement -

Latest article

Supreme Court TCPA ATDS Ruling a Big Win for Telemarketers

On April 1, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in the matter of Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid that is...

Is John Monarch Behind a $100 Million Bank Scam?

John Monarch was promoted Heavily by Affiliate Summit Founder Missy Ward, raising lots of questions. The Securities and Exchange commission delivered an early...

FTC Releases 2020 Annual Highlights

On March 25, 2021, the Federal Trade Commission released its 2020 Annual Highlights, emphasizing the agency’s ongoing efforts to protect consumers. “Despite the challenges...

Marketing Fraud Continues to Grow in 2021, and Ad Companies Are Clueless

A new report from White Ops demonstrates that marketing fraud is growing, but that many in the online advertising space may not...

FTC Order Requires Company and Its Owner to Pay $146,249, and Stop Making Deceptive ‘Made in USA’ Claims

The Federal Trade Commission recently announced that a company that sells customizable promotional products such as wristbands, lanyards, temporary tattoos, and buttons,...